It was first presented in May 2011 by the attorney general, but could not be voted before the parliamentary adjournment.
It is now operational after a pros and cons debate animated by Opposition MPs Reza Uteem, Veda Balamoody, Steve Obeegadoo and ministers Shakeel Mohamed and Tassarajen Pillay-Chedumbrum and the attorney general Yatin Varma himself. It even led to a verbal exchange of insults between the government and Opposition MPs.
“The bill will provide for the establishment of a Council for Vocational Legal Education (CVLE), ensure that prospective law practitioners undergo adequate training and pupillage and then undertake continuing professional development programmes. It will also enable a citizen of Mauritius, who has obtained a professional qualification, to apply for admission to practise in the country as a barrister. Mauritians qualified in New Zealand, Australia, Canada and France will be able to apply for admission to the bar,” said Varma to the house. “It is crucial to have a consensus between all teams and the public as well for such a bill. The state has to ensure that barristers are properly trained. Whether this amendment will remedy several issues contained in this field remains a question,” stated Uteem.